Treatment of a recurrence after an initial endodontic treatment can consist of endodontic re-treatment or apical surgery. The literature reports comparable success rates for these two options. However, randomised controlled trials that are truly comparable to each other are unavailable as a result of which comparison and an informed choice are not really possible. In addition to the treatment outcome, consideration also has to be given to cost-effectiveness and other patient-related factors, such as pain, swelling and medication. Regarding these considerations, too, little reliable information can be found in the literature. Moreover, factors relating to insurance play an important role in the Netherlands, where only apical surgery is covered by the basic healthcare insurance. In conclusion, all of these factors should be carefully considered before proceeding to an individual treatment strategy.
Auteur(s) | J. de Lange |
---|---|
Rubriek | Onderzoek en wetenschap |
Publicatiedatum | 5 februari 2016 |
Editie | Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd - Jaargang 123 - editie 2 - februari 2016; 84-88 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.5177/ntvt.2016.02.15147 |
Er zitten geen programma's in het winkelmandje